Legal Opinion

State v. Haynes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment of conviction of burglary not in a dwelling house.

Defendant assigns error to the court’s denial of his motion for a mistrial. The defendant was apprehended in the burglarized building about 2:15 a.m., on January 12,1962. A police officer who participated in the arrest testified that a few moments before he had been stationed at a window in a building a block away from the scene of the burglary. The witness was asked by the prosecutor: “What did you see that was unusual?” He answered: “A subject apparently tampering with a parking meter.” The motion…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Verduzco v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Haynes v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  4. State v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API