Legal Opinion

Louisiana Irrigation & Mill Co. v. Pousson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1971No. 3476PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULPEPPER, Judge.

Plaintiff filed this suit under LSA-C.C.P. Article 3663(2) to enjoin the defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s possession of a servitude for a lateral irrigation canal. The district judge granted a temporary restraining order and, after hearing, a preliminary injunction. Defendant appealed. Plaintiff answered the appeal, seeking a permanent injunction.

The substantial issue is whether plaintiff has proved it possessed the servitude for more than a year previous to defendant’s disturbance of that possession on or about March 20, 1970.

For the purpose of clarity, we have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Acadia-Vermilion Rice Irrigating Co. v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Churchill Farms, Inc. v. GaudetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Wild v. LeBlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parkway Development Corp. v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Louisiana Irrigation and Mill Company v. PoussonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  3. Parkway Development Corp. v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Louisiana Irrigation & Mill Co. v. PoussonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  5. Louisiana Irrigation and Mill Company v. PoussonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API