Legal Opinion

Jamie Rourk v. Bank of America National Association

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 30, 2014No. 13-15183UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Jamie Rourk appeals' from the district court’s grant of summary judgment against her on all claims stemming from Appellee Bank of America National Association’s (“BANA”) actions with respect to a mortgage it held on Rourk’s home. The district court held that Rourk’s failure to make any payment on her mortgage for over two years caused her default and put her into foreclosure. Because we agree that any damages stem from Rourk’s own default, we affirm. 1

Rourk argues that BANA was the first party to breach the note and deed when it failed to apply payments made during Rourk’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Saul Catalan v. RBC Mortgage CompanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Heritage Creek Development Corp. v. Colonial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. L. D. F. Family Farm, Inc. v. CharterbankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Ott v. Vineville Market, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
  2. Thomas v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API