Legal Opinion

Betsinger v. D.R. Horton, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2010No. 50510PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Parraguirre, C.J.:

In this opinion, we consider the proper burden of proof that should apply for a cause of action brought under NRS Chapter 598’s deceptive trade practices statutory scheme. We conclude that any cause of action for deceptive trade practices under NRS Chapter 598 must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. We further conclude that a substantial portion of Steven Betsinger’s compensatory damage award must be reversed because he failed to present evidence of any physical manifestation of emotional distress. As a consequence of this decision, we reverse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Barmettler v. Reno Air, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada BellNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Chowdhry v. NLVH, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Bongiovi v. SullivanNevada Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Alhassid v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
  2. Kennedy v. Carriage Cemetery Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2010
  3. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Holcomb v. Georgia Pacific, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. JONES VS. U.S. BANK NAT'L ASS'NNevada Supreme Court · 2020

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API