Legal Opinion

United States v. Gomez-Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 31, 2012No. 10-10441PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Miguel Angel Gomez-Hernandez (“Gomez-Hernandez”) appeals the forty-one-month sentence imposed by the district court following his conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), enhanced by 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). He challenges the district court’s determination that his prior Arizona state court conviction for attempted aggravated assault is a crime of violence, and the resulting sixteen-level sentencing enhancement under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). 1

Gomez-Hernandez’s principal contention on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. Palomino GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  5. State v. FierroaArizona Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Faustino GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Deshawn DozierCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Leland SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Alberto Garcia-JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Urbano Castillo-MarinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API