Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Schroeder (Child Custody)

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2013No. 60600Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

"The moving party has the burden of establishing that it is in the child's best interest to reside outside of Nevada with the moving parent as the primary physical custodian. The issue is whether it is in the best interest of the child to live with parent A in a different state or parent B in Nevada." Potter at 618, 119 P.3d at 1250. Child custody decisions rest within the district court's sound discretion. See Wallace v. Wallace, 112 Nev. 1015, 1019,

922 P.2d 541, 543

(1996). Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court applied the correct legal standard as set forth in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wallace v. WallaceNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  2. FGA, INC. v. GiglioNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Rico v. RodriguezNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Mosley v. FigliuzziNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Young v. Nevada Title Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API