Legal Opinion

United States v. Warrant Authorizing the Interception of Oral Communications Within the Premises

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided August 12, 1981No. M81-18PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR INSPECTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 2518(8)(d)

LOUGHLIN, District Judge.

The caption of this case is misleading for the purposes of this order. The movants are hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs and the United States of America as defendant in order to avoid confusion. The plaintiffs request the court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2518(8)(d) to make available to them or their counsel for inspection copies of the application for an order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2518 authorizing the interception of oral communications within premises known as the ground floor of 165 Atwells…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. FerleDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
  2. In re the United States for an Order Authorizing the Interception of Oral Communications at the Premises Known as Calle Mayaguez 212District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API