Legal Opinion

Schtul v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 9, 1928No. 12,060PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Denison

Wilson had a verdict and judgment in an action brought by him against Schtul for deceit, with a finding of malice, fraud and wilful deceit. The latter brings error and moves for supersedeas. Each party asks us to determine the case on this motion.

The deceit complained of was that Schtul induced Wilson to accept a note of one Bentley for $520' in part payment for certain land by representing that Bentley was solvent; that he was the owner of a large cattle ranch in Elbert county, and of five or six hundred head of cattle and that he was so good financially that no security need be taken, all…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zang v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  2. Erisman v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. In re Estate of ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  4. Colorado Investment Loan Co. v. BeuchatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  5. Hanson v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Masser v. FoxworthySupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API