Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Palmer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2000No. 2000-1140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. The unauthorized practice of law consists of “the rendering of legal services for another by any person not admitted to practice in Ohio * * *.” Gov.Bar R. VII(2)(A). We have held that the practice of law “embraces the preparation of pleadings and other papers incident to actions and special proceedings and the management of such actions and proceedings on behalf of clients before judges and courts.” Akron Bar Assn. v. Greene (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 279, 280, 673 N.E.2d 1307, 1308.

Respondent prepared and filed a complaint, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Akron Bar Ass'n v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. SpurlockOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. SpurlockOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API