Legal Opinion

Mossburg v. Montgomery County, Md.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 10, 1993No. 84, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

The principal issue in this zoning case concerns the validity of a requirement that four out of the five members of the Montgomery County Board of Appeals approve an application for a special exception. The requirement, often referred to as a “supermajority” requirement, was enacted by the County Council of Montgomery County in its zoning ordinance, § 59-A-4.128 of the Montgomery County Code, and was embodied in a Board of Appeals’ rule. It was not, however, expressly authorized by the General Assembly in the zoning enabling statute.

I

On October 10, 1989, William H. Mossburg,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Schultz v. PrittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Bryniarski v. Montgomery County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. United Steelworkers of America AFL-CIO, Local 2610 v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Town of Somerset v. Montgomery County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Derry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Insurance Commissioner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API