Legal Opinion
Sams v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 24, 1968No. 4454PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge.
The principal claim in this appeal from a conviction of disorderly conduct (jostling) is that the trial court erred in granting the government’s motion to amend after appellant moved to dismiss the information for failure to include therein material allegations required by statute.
D.C.Code 1967, § 22-1121, provides in pertinent part that
Whoever, with intent to provoke a breach of the peace, or under circumstances such that a breach of the peace may be occasioned thereby—
******(4) interferes with any person in any place by jostling against such person or unnecessarily…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Muncy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
- People v. SchultzNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Dianne Feeley v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Haugen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- District of Columbia v. JordanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rodgers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972