Legal Opinion
Acunto v. Conklin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 5, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Spain, J.
Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Williams, J.), entered April 3, 2000 in Saratoga County, which, inter alia, granted a motion by defendants to establish the reasonableness of the settlement amount.
Plaintiff commenced this action against the owner of certain property, defendant Bruce S. Conklin, and the general contractor, defendant Bruce S. Conklin and Company, raising Labor Law claims for personal injuries sustained in a fall from a roof. *713Defendants thereafter commenced a third-party action seeking indemnification for plaintiffs claims against third-party…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Dunn v. . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Codling v. PagliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Acunto v. ConklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Pahl v. GrenierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Caruso v. Northeast Emergency Medical Associates, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Muff v. Lallave Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004