Roberts v. State

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

HAWKINS, Judge.

It now appears from a supplemental transcript that the defects causing the dismissal of the appeal resulted from incorrect copying in the transcript of the judgment and appeal bond. As they now appear in the supplemental transcript no defects are shown. The appeal will be reinstated and the case considered on its merits.

The indictment under which appellant was convicted charged that he unlawfully possessed a “certain still, mash, material, equipment, and supplies for the manufacture of liquor capable of producing intoxication.” No motion to quash…