Habersham Memorial Park, Inc. v. Moore

I agree with the majority that “the evidence would clearly authorize a finding that Mr. Kelley’s actions were an unlawful and unwarranted interference with Mrs. Moore’s exercise of’ the right of *683burial of Mr. Moore. I also believe that the majority is correct in holding that “the private right to bury Mr. Moore belonged only to Mrs. Moore and that the other appellees were not entitled to recover for an interference with that right . . .” In my opinion, this determination should have resulted in a further holding that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for directed verdict as…