Merchant & Evans, Inc. v. Roosevelt Building Products Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
HUTTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action in four counts. Count I of the amended complaint is brought under § 43(a) of the Lanham Trademark Act of 1946, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 1125. This section of the Lanham Act creates a cause of action for false designation of origin. Count II asserts a claim of trademark infringement pursuant to § 32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114. Count III alleges a common law claim of improper use of trade secrets. Count IV avers non-privileged imitation proscribed under New Jersey common law.
P…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Century 21 Real Estate Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Billy Sandlin, an Individual, Dba Century Investments & Realty, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Merchant & Evans, Inc. v. Roosevelt Building Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Merchant & Evans, Inc. v. Roosevelt Building Products Company, Inc., Roosevelt Building Products Company, Inc., Counter-Claimant v. Merchant & Evans, Inc., Counter-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992