MATTER OF FRANCO v. Velez
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
The Appellate Division found that 21 volumes were submitted by respondent. They were numbered sequentially beginning with “1” and ending with “21”. Although there were no volumes numbered “5”, “12” or “14”, two volumes were each labeled “10” and two separately submitted volumes were labeled “1”. As found below, when these volumes are substituted for volumes “5”, “12” and “14”, there are 21 volumes as indicated on the cover sheet. Moreover, since 5,000 signatures are required and respondent’s…
2Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MaxamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Erazo v. RuizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Liotti v. Nassau County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- McLeod v. Del ToroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985