Legal Opinion

MATTER OF FRANCO v. Velez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The Appellate Division found that 21 volumes were submitted by respondent. They were numbered sequentially beginning with “1” and ending with “21”. Although there were no volumes numbered “5”, “12” or “14”, two volumes were each labeled “10” and two separately submitted volumes were labeled “1”. As found below, when these volumes are substituted for volumes “5”, “12” and “14”, there are 21 volumes as indicated on the cover sheet. Moreover, since 5,000 signatures are required and respondent’s…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MaxamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Erazo v. RuizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Liotti v. Nassau County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. McLeod v. Del ToroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API