Legal Opinion

McDonnell v. Birrell

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 17, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMIERI, District Judge.

Preliminary Statement

On July 5, 6 and 7,1961, the first cause of action in this derivative suit was tried before me. The trial followed many months of dedicated effort by plaintiff’s counsel to expose a bold and outrageous corporate swindle. The issues now presented for final adjudication relate to plaintiff’s prayer for the return and cancellation of one million fraudulently issued shares of Doeskin Products, Inc. (Doeskin). Although this huge bloc of shares represented control of Doeskin, no consideration was ever received by the corporation for any of the shares…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. TabahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Ferguson v. BirrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. Weinberger v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. In re the Election of Directors of Doeskin Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McDonnell v. American Leduc Petroleums, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. McDonnell v. TabahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. In the Matter of Swan-Finch Oil Corporation, Keta Gas and Oil Company, Swan-Finch Petro Chemical Corporation, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. McDONNELL v. TABAHCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. In re Swan-Finch Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API