Legal Opinion
Faye Ricci v. Clark Scott, Wyatt Scott, and Kelly Scott; Stites & Harbison PLLC; Boehl Stopher & Graves, LLP
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 28, 2026No. 3:23-cv-00063Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-00063-RSE FAYE RICCI PLAINTIFF VS. CLARK SCOTT, et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Faye Ricci’s Motion for Sanctions against Defendants Clark Scott, Wyatt Scott, and Kelly Scott and Interested Parties Stites & Harbison PLLC and Boehl Stopher & Graves, LLP. (DN 108-1). Defendants Clark Scott, Wyatt Scott, and Kelly Scott filed a response (DN 112), as did Interested Parties Stites & Harbison PLLC (DN 111), and Boehl Stopher & Graves, LLP (DN 118), to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United Coin Meter Company, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad, a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- John Carpenter v. City of FlintCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.