Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Davis v. A. C. L. R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 14, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] A motion to quash the alternative writ herein was denied, State ex rel. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 95 Fla. 14, 116 So. R. 48. The writ requires the respondent to restore its track into Monticello and to render the public service there. The respondent has answered and the relators move for a peremptory writ notwithstanding the answer.

"A return to a sufficient alternative writ of mandamus must state all the facts relied upon by the respondent with such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Davis v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Harrington v. City of PompanoSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Rempsen v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. City of Miami Beach v. State Ex Rel. Pickin'Chicken of Lincoln Road, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. BALFORD HARBOUR VILLAGE v. State Ex Rel. GiblinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. State ex rel. Davis v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API