Legal Opinion

Heiman v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1972No. 9038PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLANCHE, Judge.

Defendant, The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, issued to plaintiff, Harold Heiman, a Livestock Transportation and Mortality Policy which insured against the death of the quarter horse, Salty Clabber. The horse died and defendant refused to pay because it claimed that plaintiff had violated Section 1 of the general conditions of the policy. The following is the text of that provision:

“GENERAL CONDITIONS
“1. NOTICE OF SICKNESS OR INJURY:
“The Assured shall at all times provide proper care and attention for each animal hereby insured. In the event of any illness,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Albert v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Porche v. Robinson Bros., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Holloway v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Heiman v. Insurance Co. of the PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API