Legal Opinion
Bernardo v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
Decided February 8, 2007No. GDTC-T-05-114-FOEPublished
1Opinion of the Court
BACKGROUND
EAGAN, Judge.
The case was tried to the Gaming Disputes Court, at which time seven witnesses *382testified and multiple exhibits entered into the record.
The issues in this case are predominantly factual, rather than legal in nature. According to the plaintiff, the preponderance of the evidence introduced at trial establishes that on February 25, 2005, the plaintiff and his brother arrived at the Mohegan Sun Casino mid-afternoon where they parked on the 5th floor of the Riverview Garage.
At the time, the 5th level of the garage appeared clean of snow and ice. However, there were mounds of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Bunnell v. Waterbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Baptiste v. Better Val-U Supermarket, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- McCrorey v. HeilpernSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Gentile v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.