Legal Opinion

Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. Harper

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1996No. 95-1148PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this case we determine whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed an anti-suit injunction on the basis that the enjoined suit was vexatious and brought to harass. 905 S.W.2d 804. Based on our decisions in Christensen v. Integrity Ins. Co., 719 S.W.2d 161 (Tex.1986), and Gannon v. Payne, 706 S.W.2d 304 (Tex.1986), we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and dissolve the injunction.

Mary Harper died of cancer in December 1993, after receiving treatment at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. Todd and Mary Harper had a medical insurance policy issued by Golden Rule…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gannon v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Christensen v. Integrity Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Admiral Insurance Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. Harper, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995

4Cited by94 opinions

  1. Frost National Bank v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Howell v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  3. In Re AutoNation, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Gonzalez v. Reliant Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Monsanto Co. v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API