Tucker v. Korpita
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
The issue in this case is whether appellant was entitled to an intervening cause jury instruction. We find, under the facts of this case, that the trial court erred by not instructing the jury as requested. We reverse and remand.
In December 2007, appellee rear-ended appellant while driving in West Palm Beach. Appellant filed a claim for negligence. Appellee admitted negligence and a trial ensued only on the issues of causation and damages.
At trial, appellant called several expert witnesses. Dr. Robert Simon testified about performing a minimally invasive dis-cectomy on appellant. Dr. Simon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stuart v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- J. Ray Arnold Lumber Corp. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Seaboard Coastline R. Co. v. AddisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Dungan v. FordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Emory v. Florida Freedom NewspapersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pedro v. BaberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES-REPORT NO. 13-02Supreme Court of Florida · 2014
- In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases-Report No. 15-01Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
- In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases - Report No. 15-01Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
- In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases – Report No. 15-01 – Corrected OpinionSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.