Legal Opinion

Usry v. Hadden

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1953No. 34262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

1. Findings of fact by a director of the Stale Board of Workmen’s Compensation, which are affirmed on appeal to the full board, are, when supported by any evidence, conclusive upon the courts. Reeves v. Royal Indemnity Co., 73 Ga. App. 2 (1) (35 S. E. 2d, 473). Consequently, the finding of the single director that T. C. Hadden was the emplojrer of the claimant’s son, and that T. J. Hadden was not his employer, which finding was supported by direct testimony of both T. C. and T. J. Hadden and of three or four other witnesses, though *711controverted by the claimants in their testimony, and which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reeves v. Royal Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walker v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Peter E. Blum & Co. v. First Bank Building Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API