Legal Opinion

Williams v. Black

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Day County. Hon. J. H. McCoy, Judge. Action by David Williams against Charles F. Black. From an order 'sustaining a demurrer to the amended answer, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an action for libel, and it is alleged in the complaint: “That on the 6th day of February, 1908, the defendant was the editor, publisher, and properietor of the Waubay Clipper, a weekly -newspaper published at Waubay in said Day county, S. D. That on the 6th day of February, 1908, the defendant maliciously composed and published concerning the plaintiff, in said newspaper, the following false and defamatory words, to wit: ‘Will the farmers of Day county vote to retain in power a man who entered a- combination to kill competition ,of the lumber business in Webster? That was the object…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hunt v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Snyder v. AndrewsNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Torrey v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
  5. Johnson v. . JenkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lancour v. Herald & Globe Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. Salzano v. North Jersey Media Group Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  3. Gamble v. KeyesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Medico v. Time, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Bernard v. Metropolis Land Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API