Legal Opinion

The D. Newcomb

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtAcheson, J.

The complainant was the owner of a barge having aboard a cargo of cinder, lying in the Allegheny river at the foot of Thirty-second street, Pittsburgh, which the steam tow-boat D. New-comb undertook to tow from that point to Braddock, on the Monongahela river. On the morning of April 21, 1882, the barge was delivered into the custody of the Newcomb, which proceeded therewith down the Allegheny river. At this time the steam-boat 0. W. Batch-elor was coming up the Ohio river to her landing on the Monongahela river at the foot of Wood street, in the port of Pittsburgh. When the Newcomb had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. The Steamer WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Clarke v. The FashionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1852

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doherty v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  2. The White CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Sinram Bros. v. Reading Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API