Hart v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtVickery, J.
We have deemed it necessary to cite this much of the record and the matters leading up to the conviction by reason of the argument adduced by the plaintiff in error’s counsel as to why there is error in this record that would warrant and compel the court to reverse the judgment.
In the trial of this action which took place in the September Term, 1931, the term in which all the three mentioned cases were tried and in which a conviction was had in each case, it is claimed that error was committed, both as to the way in which the sentence was imposed and as to the cross-examination and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. StearnsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Weber v. Alvis, WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 1951