Konecky v. Kronfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura VisitacionLewis, J.), entered March 6, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, directed defendant to pay $11,000 per month in pendente lite spousal maintenance, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The predominant consideration of the court in determining an award of temporary spousal maintenance is the financial need of the party making the application, with the parties’ income and assets to be taken into account (Ritter v Ritter, 135 AD2d 421, 422 [1987]). As is often the case, the temporary award is based on conflicting…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ritter v. RitterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Grant v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nacos v. NacosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Brenner v. BrennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Nacos v. NacosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012