Legal Opinion

State v. Hayward

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 2, 2017No. Docket: Kno-16-223PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.

[¶ 1] Bethany Hayward appeals from a judgment of conviction of theft by unauthorized taking or transfer (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. § 353(1)(B)(6) (2016), and theft by deception (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. § 354(1)(B)(6) (2016), entered by the trial court (Knox County, Stokes, J.) following a jury trial. Hayward contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support either conviction. She also appeals from her sentence, arguing that the court violated her right to be free from double jeopardy by convicting and sentencing her on both counts of theft without consolidating them. See…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Karl v. KittredgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. State v. DrewrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. State v. BouchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  4. State v. HaagSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  5. State v. MedeirosSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Benjamin H. Hodgdon IISupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. State of Maine v. Timothy D. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  3. State of Maine v. Gregory P. McLaughlinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  4. State of Maine v. Gregory P. McLaughlinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  5. State of Maine v. Bethany HaywardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API