Legal Opinion · Dissent

Friends of Thayer Lake LLC v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 2015Published

1DissentRose, J.

In our view, the Mud Pond Waterway (hereinafter the Waterway) does not meet the navigable-in-fact test under common law and, therefore, we respectfully dissent. The Waterway is defined by the parties to include the Narrows *32of Lilypad Pond, Mud Pond, the Mud Pond Outlet Rapids, the Mud Pond Outlet Brook and the Shingle Shanty Brook from the junction of the Mud Pond Outlet Brook until it reaches publicly-owned land. Mud Pond itself is shallow and narrow, and the rapids at the outlet are approximately 500 feet in length. Given the rocky terrain and shallowness of the water, the rapids are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Smith v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Morgan v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Adirondack League Club, Inc. v. Sierra ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Fairchild v. KraemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API