Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Law Offices of Boone v. Derham-Burk (In Re Eliapo)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 28, 2003No. BAP No. NC-02-1450-MaRyB, Bankruptcy No. 01-50227Published

1Concurrence

RYAN, Bankruptcy Judge, concurring.

While I agree with the outcome of the opinion, I write separately because I believe the Ch. 13 Payment Guidelines (the *406“Guidelines”) are self-defeating, ambiguous, and need modification.

It appears that, under the current practice in the Northern District of California, the Guidelines are not binding on the attorneys. In other words, an attorney can opt for the “no look” fees, get paid the fees, and later seek a full § 330 review on application should the attorney believe that additional fees are warranted on the very same services that he sought and received…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gill v. Von Wittenburg (In Re Financial Corp. of America)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. In Re ArgentoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  3. In Re PedersenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1999
  4. In Re SzymczakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  5. In Re WatkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API