Law Offices of Boone v. Derham-Burk (In Re Eliapo)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
RYAN, Bankruptcy Judge, concurring.
While I agree with the outcome of the opinion, I write separately because I believe the Ch. 13 Payment Guidelines (the *406“Guidelines”) are self-defeating, ambiguous, and need modification.
It appears that, under the current practice in the Northern District of California, the Guidelines are not binding on the attorneys. In other words, an attorney can opt for the “no look” fees, get paid the fees, and later seek a full § 330 review on application should the attorney believe that additional fees are warranted on the very same services that he sought and received…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gill v. Von Wittenburg (In Re Financial Corp. of America)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re ArgentoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- In Re PedersenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1999
- In Re SzymczakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- In Re WatkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.