Legal Opinion

L. Gruizzetti & Son v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1978No. Appeal, No. 1492 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The only issue remaining in this workmen’s compensation appeal is that of whether the record supports the referee’s finding that the appellant was the employer of the injured workman.

John Corum, a mushroom worker, suffered injuries to his wrist when he fell from a conveyor while he was engaged in emptying a mushroom house. The basic facts are not seriously in dispute. The appellant, a partnership known as G & G, owned conveyors used in *412emptying (and filling) mushroom houses. Gr & G rented these machines to mushroom growers. G & G had in its employ one Reggie Eastridge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Fanning v. Apawana Golf ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krumins Roofing & Siding v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API