Legal Opinion
Stone Man, Inc. v. Green
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 23, 1995No. S95A1279PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Justice.
In a previous nuisance action, appellees (Landowners) sought to have The Stone Man, Inc.’s (Stone Man) quarry closed. Although the jury found the quarry to be a nuisance, the trial court granted Landowners only a partial injunction which allowed Stone Man to continue operation of the quarry with some restrictions. This grant of partial injunctive relief was affirmed on appeal. Stone Man, Inc. v. Green, 263 Ga. 470 (435 SE2d 205) (1993) (Stone Man I).
Landowners then brought this nuisance action, seeking to recover for damages resulting from Stone Man’s subsequent operation of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stone Man, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Trust Co. Bank v. Citizens & Southern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Waldrop v. BettisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Bodeneck v. Cater's Motor Freight System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
- DeKalb County v. BolickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MacKo v. City of LawrencevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Mathis v. DurhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Stone Man, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Turner v. FlournoySupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Turner v. FlournoySupreme Court of Georgia · 2004