Legal Opinion

Baker v. City of New Orleans

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1989No. 89-CA-0440PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLOTKIN, Judge.

Defendant City of New Orleans appeals a trial court judgment in favor of plaintiff Mark Baker, claiming that the plaintiff failed to prove that the driver of the car involved in the accident which injured the plaintiff was an employee of the city, involved in the course and scope of his employment. Plaintiff cross-appeals, contesting the trial court’s finding that he was one-third comparatively negligent in causing the accident and seeking an increase in the award of $53,026.10 ($8,026.10 stipulated medical expenses plus $45,000 in general damages) reduced by one-third, for a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reck v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Bitoun v. LandrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. Emerson v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  4. Cooley v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Casimere v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boudreaux v. SCHWEGMANN GIANT SUPERMKT.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Doe v. Roman Catholic ChurchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Jackson v. Family Dollar Stores of La. Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Baker v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. Suhre v. Jefferson Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API