Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. District Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 1992No. 91SA329Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Lohr

The plurality1 holds that H.B. 91S2-1038,2 which authorizes the death penalty to be imposed as punishment for crimes committed before that statute was enacted, is consistent with the provisions of the Colorado and United States Constitutions prohibiting the enactment of ex post facto laws. See Colo. Const, art. II, § 11; U.S. Const, art. I, § 10, cl. 1. I respectfully dissent, placing reliance principally on the Colorado Constitution.3

Lest technical legal analysis obscure the nature and gravity of the controversy, it is important to keep in sharp focus the salient facts and the central…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API