Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Aiken

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1967No. 38592, 38629Published

1Dissent

*354Donworth, J.

(dissenting)—I cannot agree with the majority opinion in these two cases because, after an exhaustive examination of the voluminous record and briefs, I am convinced that both defendants were denied rights guaranteed them by the fifth 'and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution as construed and applied by the United States Supreme Court in recent decisions.

Before stating my reasons for dissenting, I think it appropriate to quote the definition of a fair and impartial trial which this court has approved on several occasions. It is stated in State v. Lindsey, 27 Wn.2d…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API