Legal Opinion
Fraioli v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 25, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while employed by the defendant at its Readville shops. The declaration and bill of particulars alleged that the plaintiff was injured by reason of negligence of the defendant, its servants or agents, “because of the omission by the defendant to provide suitable platforms, ways and means and such other facilities as would eliminate the need for the plaintiff to walk on pipes and insecure footing in the performance of his duties.” It was admitted that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moynihan v. Hills Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Bernabeo v. KaulbackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Sylvain v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- O'Toole v. PruynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Wood v. DanasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pittsley v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Sjostedt v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Maciejewski v. Graton & Knight Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Spear v. Chelsea Building Wrecking Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Wood v. Canadian Imperial Dry Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.