Legal Opinion

Amerofina, Inc. v. U. S. Industries, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1975No. Appeal, No. 484PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

This case, evolving from a complex history of facts, represents a suit by Amerofina, Inc. [hereinafter Amero-*396fina,] against U. S. Industries, Inc. [hereinafter USI] to recover a “finder’s fee” which Amerofina alleges is due it for services rendered under an oral contract. Amero-fina alleges that USI agreed to compensate Amerofina for its assistance in locating and procuring acquisition candidates for USI’s program of corporate growth and amalgamation.

USI does not deny the existence of the oral contract, but it asserts that under the terms of the contract Amero-fina was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Simon v. Electrospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Minichiello v. Royal Business Funds Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Westinghouse Electric Co. v. Murphy, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kinnel, Eugene F. v. Mid-Atlantic Mausoleums, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Computer Print Systems, Inc. v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Keystone Floor Products Co. v. Beattie Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Sachs v. Continental Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Sachs v. LesserCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API