Legal Opinion

PERRONG v. CALLER IDENTIFIED AS CONNOR

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 4, 2023No. 1:22-cv-04479Unknown

1Opinion

[ECF No. 3] THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE ANDREW R. PERRONG, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 22-4479 (CPO/EAP) CALLER IDENTIFIED AS CONNOR, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court by way of pro se Plaintiff Andrew R. Perrong’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery. Pl.’s Motion for Discovery Seeking Leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference, ECF No. 3 (“Pl.’s Motion”). The Court has considered the moving papers and decides this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alston v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Manny Film LLC v. Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 50.166.88.98District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  3. Teltech Systems, Incorporated v. Phil BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API