Legal Opinion
Haynes v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided April 22, 1969No. 6 Div. 386PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction of buying, receiving or concealing stolen prop erty, etc., in violation of Section 338, Title 14, Code 1940. The punishment imposed was six years in the penitentiary.
At the close of the State’s evidence in chief the defense counsel moved to exclude the evidence. The motion is as follows:
“Judge, for the record, may I, at this time, move to exclude the State’s evidence as to the indictment and to each count thereof, separately and severally, that the corpus delicti has not been proved, that, generally, it has not been proved, that there…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Orr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Britton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
- Coats v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Odom v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968
- Simmons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by17 opinions
- Payton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Hale v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1969
- McConnell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Buckles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.