Legal Opinion

Blue Cross/Blue Shield v. St. Cyr

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 24, 1983No. 82-029, 82-379PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.

These consolidated appeals require us to determine whether the plaintiff, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of New Hampshire-Vermont (Blue Cross/Blue Shield), followed proper procedures in attempting to enforce its contractual subrogation rights.

In the first case the defendant, Marc St. Cyr, was seriously injured when a motorcycle on which he was a passenger was struck by a school bus. At the time of the accident, Marc St. Cyr was a minor. Most of Marc St. Cyr’s medical expenses resulting from the accident were paid by Blue Cross/Blue Shield.

In July 1979, Blue Cross/Blue Shield advised the boy’s father,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hangar One, Inc. v. Davis Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Estes v. CrosbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Sibson v. Robert's Express, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
  4. Heath Ex Rel. Heath v. SeymourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. Montello Shoe Co. v. Suncook Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Panto v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. Smith v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Dimick v. LewisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. Reed v. National Council of the Boy Scouts of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
  5. Rand v. Town of ExeterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API