Legal Opinion

Pheil v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1991No. A91A1118PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

The Pheils appeal from a jury verdict in favor of Southern Bell in their lawsuit for damages arising out of an automobile accident. Southern Bell stipulated liability in the accident and the case was tried solely on the issue of damages.

1. In their first enumeration of error, the Pheils claim that the trial court erred in refusing to disqualify a juror for cause, thus requiring the use of a peremptory strike. The juror over whom the dispute arose was the wife of a retired Southern Bell employee who received a pension from the company. The trial judge examined the juror and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Carver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Wigley v. HambrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Morris v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Prevost v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ford v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Lee v. BartusekCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Georgia Ports Authority v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Parker v. Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Ford v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API