Legal Opinion

Martin v. Martin

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 9, 1985No. Civ. 4800PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a modification of divorce decree case.

After an ore tenus hearing, the trial court ordered the husband to pay certain unpaid medical bills, interpreted the original divorce decree so as to require the husband to pay certain future medical bills, increased the amount of child support, and awarded the wife an attorney's fee.

The husband appeals, contending that the trial court's actions regarding the above require reversal. We find no error and affirm.

We do not deem it necessary to set out in detail the facts. The pertinent facts of this appeal are:

The parties were divorced in November…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Parrish v. ParrishCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Stubbs v. PulsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Cain v. CainCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Epperson v. EppersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Tampling Tile Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Dodd v. DoddCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Transamerican Properties, Inc. v. WatkinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Bender v. BenderCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API