Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Fordyce v. Vaughn

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 11, 1989No. 89-251Published

1ConcurrenceTom Glaze, Justice

While I concur with its conclusion, I believe the majority opinion’s logic is flawed. The following chronology of events is important:

June 15, 1987 Landowner, Bailey, applied to rezone his property from Residential 1 to Commercial 1.

July 9, 1987 Fordyce Zoning and Planning Commission denied Bailey’s application.

November 16, 1987 Fordyce City Council overturned its Planning Commission’s decision by passing Ordinance No. 879, which rezoned the Bailey property to Commercial 1.

December 8, 1987 — Fordyce City Council changed its prior decision by passing Ordinance No. 880, which repealed Ordinance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taggart & Taggart Seed Company, Inc. v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Potocki v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Price v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API