Legal Opinion

McLaughlin, Trustee v. Retherford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1944No. 4-7495PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.

This appeal involves the Firemen’s Belief and Pension Fund Act (Act No. 491 of 1921 and amendments) as found in § 7737, et seq., Pope’s Digest.

Appellee filed this action against appellants, who are the trustees (§ 7738, Pope’s Digest) of the Firemen’s Belief .and Pension Fund of the city of Hot Springs, praying that he be granted a pension under the act. The salient facts, shown by stipulation and evidence practically uncontroverted, are: appellee served as a fireman of the city of Hot Springs from January 1, 1926, to May 10, 1942, when he entered the United States Army. He received a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adamson v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. State v. LindsaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  3. Jones v. HadfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Schoedinger v. LentzOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Morrilton v. ComesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Nahlen v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Smith v. Little Rock Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees of Houston v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Feuchter v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API