Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentRhesa Hawkins Barksdale, Circuit Judge
Notwithstanding my great admiration for my brethren in the majority, I respectfully disagree with their holding that the district court abused its discretion in imposing sanctions, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Instead, I would hold that the district court acted within its considerable discretion in ruling that neither Paul S. Minor’s writ-request, nor his conduct during its execution, was objectively reasonable.
The majority quite properly labels Minor’s “intentional use of publicity for the purpose of embarrassing an adversary ... patently inappropriate”, Maj.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Boyce W. Childs v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Bruce C. Waltzer, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Walker v. City of BogalusaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Van Huss v. LandsbergDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.