Birdsall v. Bemiss
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the District Court of St. Mary, Boyce, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
Rost,-Jí
The'plaintiff, in his-capacity of curator of the estate of Wm. S. Barr, claims from the defendants the sum of $3,000, on account of acceptances and'other obligations,-as will be made to appear by reference to their books. The defendant JR. B. Brashear alone answered,- and filed a general denial. Judgment was rendered-in his favor, and the plaintiff appealed. It has been stated in argument that the defendant R. B. Brashear was curator of Barr's succession, and that he took the notes and property-of the succession, and put them jnto the firm of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Kennedy v. Perry Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Futch v. AddisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Burch v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964