Legal Opinion

City of Fort Smith v. O.K. Foods, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 1987No. 87-104PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The issue on appeal is the validity of a Fort Smith ordinance which increased sewer user fees. The chancellor found that the ordinance was not valid until the city published it in a local newspaper and in its decree awarded the appellees a partial refund of the increased sewer charges paid before that time. The city argues that the trial court erred in holding the ordinance was temporarily invalid and the appellees argue on their cross-appeal that the trial court erred in holding that the ordinance was ever enforceable. We affirm on direct appeal and reverse on cross…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. City of Hot Springs v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Adams v. SimsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Freeze v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  5. Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. McCullough Tool Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Burke v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Houston v. City of Hot SpringsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2004
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API