Metropolitan Plate Glass & Casualty Insurance v. Hawes' Extx.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Nunn —
Affirming.
Appellee’s intestate held an insurance policy in appellant company, which provided for weekly payments .in the event of sickness. He became sick, gave the required notice and made application for $10 a week for twenty weeks. The company refused to pay; and this action was instituted. Appellee’s intestate’s deposition was the only evidence introduced on the trial and the court found in appellee’s favor, the sum of $200.
There is only one question raised on this appeal, and that is, what meaning should be given to clause one of the policy? It is as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Bishop v. United States Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by18 opinions
- Great Eastern Casualty Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Bankson v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Fowler v. United Equitable InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Penrose v. Commercial Travelers Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. LewisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.