Anile v. Nyquist

Proceeding under CPLR article 78 instituted in the Appellate Division, Third Department, to review a determination of the Board of Regents which suspended petitioner’s license to practice chiropractic for a period of one year. Petitioner’s argument that section 6559 • (subd. 1, par. h) of the Education Law is unconstitutional is without merit. iChiropraetic, having close concern with the public health, is a field where the police power of the State may be asserted in order to limit its practice to only properly qualified persons (Wasmuth v. Allen, 14 N Y 2d 391, 399). We further conclude that…